Trong một kỳ nghỉ ở Macedonia, Masri bị bắt bởi nhà chức trách nước này vào ngày 31/12/2003. Sau 23 ngày, anh ta bị chuyển giao cho CIA và đưa sang Kabul, Afghanistan, bằng máy bay.
Masri nói anh ta bị đánh, thẩm vấn và giam giữ như một nghi can khủng bố, mặc dù quan chức CIA nhanh chóng xác định anh ta vô tội. Anh nói anh được đưa bằng máy bay về Albania và được thả vào ngày 28/5/2004.
Anh ta nhờ luật sư thưa CIA ở tòa Mỹ nhưng bị bác đơn, và sau đó đã kháng án lên tòa tối cao nhưng cũng bị tòa này từ chối không nghe trường hợp kháng án của anh ta.
Câu chuyện này cho thấy CIA Mỹ có quyền hoạt động ngoài luật pháp Mỹ cũng như những nước chư hầu của Mỹ.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Top court won't hear appeal in CIA torture case
Tue Oct 9, 2007 12:17pm EDT
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSWAT00823120071009?feedType=RSS&fee...
By James Vicini
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A German citizen who says he was kidnapped, imprisoned and tortured overseas by the CIA lost his appeal on Tuesday when the Supreme Court refused to review a decision dismissing the case because it would expose state secrets.
Attorneys for Khaled el-Masri, a German of Lebanese descent, argued in the high court appeal that his lawsuit did not depend on the disclosure of state secrets and that it should be allowed to go forward in U.S. court.
His case, in which Masri said he was abducted in Macedonia, flown to Afghanistan and tortured, has drawn worldwide attention to the CIA's extraordinary rendition program, in which terrorism suspects are sent from one foreign country to another for interrogation. Human rights groups have strongly criticized the program.
Masri's case sparked outrage in Germany and prompted a parliamentary inquiry to find out what authorities might have known about U.S. renditions.
Masri's attorneys from the American Civil Liberties Union challenged what they called the Bush administration's increased invoking of national security secrets to prevent any judicial inquiry into serious allegations of misconduct.
The administration also has asserted the so-called state secrets privilege in an effort to dismiss the lawsuits over the warrantless domestic spying program that Bush created after the September 11 attacks.
Ben Wizner of the ACLU was disappointed by the Supreme Court decision.
"If Khaled el-Masri's case is a state secret, then virtually every case of executive misconduct can be swept under the rug," he said. "This case is not about secrecy. It's about immunity for crimes against humanity."
Masri's lawsuit, which sought damages of at least $75,000, was brought against former CIA Director George Tenet, three private aviation companies and 20 unnamed employees of the CIA and the companies.
The Supreme Court sided with the administration and rejected the appeal without any explanation or recorded dissent.
Masri said he was abducted by Macedonian authorities on December 31, 2003, while on vacation. After 23 days, he was handed over to a CIA team and flown to a CIA-run secret prison near Kabul, Afghanistan, he said.
Masri said he was beaten, interrogated and held as a terrorism suspect, even though CIA officials quickly determined his innocence. He said he was flown to Albania and released on May 28, 2004.
A federal judge and then a U.S. appeals court dismissed the lawsuit because it threatened to expose government secrets, including how the CIA supervises its most sensitive intelligence operations.
The Supreme Court formally recognized the state secrets privilege in a 1953 ruling. The ACLU's attorneys said the court has not revisited the decision in more than 50 years and urged the justices to re-examine it.
The CIA has never acknowledged any role in Masri's detention. The Bush administration opposed Masri's appeal.
Administration attorneys said lower courts applied "settled legal principles to the highly classified facts of this case" and that further review by the Supreme Court was unwarranted.
No comments:
Post a Comment